Menu
HOW WE JUDGE
Every submission is reviewed as a working digital product, not only as a screenshot. Reviewers consider the complete experience across screen sizes, input methods and realistic browsing conditions.
Technical execution
We assess reliability, responsive behaviour, semantic structure and the coherence of the implemented system. Navigation, forms, interactive states and content should work consistently, with technical decisions supporting the purpose of the website rather than creating unnecessary friction.
Performance
A strong experience should begin quickly and remain stable. We consider loading behaviour, layout movement, responsive interaction and the cost of visual effects across realistic devices and connections. Ambitious implementation is welcome when it remains disciplined.
Accessible interaction
We review practical usability through keyboard navigation, meaningful structure, visible focus, readable contrast and understandable controls. Accessibility is treated as part of implementation quality and audience reach, not as an optional layer added after design.
Creative development
We look for code, motion, sound, WebGL and interaction techniques used with intent. The strongest work translates a creative concept into a distinctive but understandable experience, with technical invention serving the visitor and the content.
Review process
The submitted URL is checked in its live form. Review may include multiple viewport sizes and interaction methods. Projects that meet the programme standard can enter the nominee archive, with stronger selections considered for daily, monthly and annual distinctions.
Editorial outcome
Award decisions are independent and final. A submission fee covers evaluation only and does not buy an award. If selected, the project receives a permanent public profile and official badge. No recurring payment is required to keep that recognition active.